Ancient geoglyph destroyed by Amazon farming

Damage to the geoglyph on a farm in Brazil’s Acre state reveals the dangers agribusiness pose to Amazon heritage
<p>Geoglyphs in the Amazon are under threat from agricultural expansion (Image: Diego Gurgel/ Secretaria do Estado do Turismo e Lazer)</p>

Geoglyphs in the Amazon are under threat from agricultural expansion (Image: Diego Gurgel/ Secretaria do Estado do Turismo e Lazer)

For decades, researchers have been uncovering archaeological treasures that prove complex civilisations existed in the Brazilian Amazon before colonialism. Perhaps the most fascinating are the more than 500 ancient geoglyphs revealed in Acre state since the 1970s.

But some of these enormous geometric designs, etched into or built onto the ground, have been destroyed even before scientists could learn about the civilisations behind them. At the end of last year, employees at Crixá farm levelled a geoglyph hundreds of square metres in size and thousands of years old to make way for grazing cattle and a corn plantation.

The damage was only recently discovered during a routine analysis by palaeontologist Alceu Ranzi, who has researched the structures for 40 years.

“This is a historical monument of importance for all humanity,” said Ranzi, lamenting the loss of a design he himself had discovered in 2001. Ranzi had described the geoglyph as “an open-air museum that in no way hinders the development of agribusiness in the region”.

The geoglyph at Crixá farm, in Capixaba municipality, is not the first to succumb to the machines and agricultural expansion that are putting Acre’s heritage at risk in order to meet growing global demand for commodities like soy.

A few years ago, two geoglyphs in the state were lost to road-building: one to the BR-317, which opens up the Amazonian municipality of Boca do Acre; and the other to the BR-364 in the municipality of Brasiléia, an important route for local agribusiness. In both cases, the geoglyphs were only discovered during the works.

The destruction of archaeological sites by public works is common in Amazonia. In Pará state, indigenous Munduruku fought for years to recover sacred urns unearthed during the construction of a hydroelectric dam.

The owner of Crixá farm, Assuero Veronez, who is also president of the Acre Federation of Agriculture, said the destruction of the geoglyph was an accident.

“A couple of years ago I told them not to interfere in the ditch area,” he said, adding: “I am willing to mitigate the damage as much as possible.”

Veronez is now awaiting a visit by staff from the Institute of National Historical and Artistic Heritage (Iphan), who will assess the damage to the site’s archaeological heritage. Ranzi’s complaint also mobilised the Federal Public Ministry and the federal police, who are investigating the case.

Geoglyphs: Humanity’s heritage

The archaeological site at Crixá farm appeared on the Indicative List of World Heritage sites that the Brazilian government presented to Unesco in 2015. In 2018, the 2,500-year-old geoglyph at the Jacó Sá archaeological site, 50 kilometres from Acre’s capital Rio Branco, became the first in the country to be listed as a cultural heritage site.

Researchers know very little about the history of Acre’s geoglyphs. Unlike the majority of those in Peru and England, rediscovered over a century ago, they are among the most recent to warrant archaeologists’ attention. These enormous figures drawn on the ground were only revealed at the end of the 20th century because of deforestation in the Amazon.

The Amazon is a constant target for exploiters, and each time it becomes more difficult to monitor and control the damaging actions
Miguel Scarcello, SOS Amazônia

The lack of genetic material in their structures suggests that there were no villages there. Some studies have argued that they represent traces of civilisations that worshipped geometric gods, and perhaps set the stage for religious rituals.

Whatever their purpose, researchers agree that geoglyphs are essential for understanding the process of occupation and settlement in the Amazon region by ancient civilisations. They also offer clues as to whether the Amazon may have been a savannah thousands of years ago, when low vegetation may have facilitated the designs.

Growing agriculture

The governor of Acre, Gladson Cameli, entered office in 2019 promising to clear any obstacles to the growth of agribusiness in Acre. Following the example of neighbouring state Rondônia, the most deforested in the Amazon, Cameli advocated expanding soy and beef production.

However, Edivan Maciel, Acre’s production secretary said clearing new terrain wasn’t necessary: “We already have enough anthropised areas [land converted by humans] to increase production and make Acre a major export hub.”

The new project came after decades of a left-wing government that advocated an environmentally sustainable economy but that failed to bring economic and social development to the state, one of the poorest in Brazil.

This policy shift concerns Miguel Scarcello from non-governmental organisation SOS Amazônia. According to Scarcello, any large-scale economic activity related to land exploitation puts the Amazon at risk.

“Unfortunately, the Amazon is a constant target for exploiters and each time it becomes more difficult to monitor and control damaging actions,” Scarcello says.

One of the current administration’s most important projects is to create a special agricultural development zone in the region along the lines of Matopiba, a hub in the Cerrado savannah that has led to the destruction of half the biome’s native vegetation.

The area has been tentatively named Amacro, a combination of the states of Amazonas, Acre and Rondônia. The man behind the scheme is none other than the owner of Crixá farmer, Assuero Veronez. In a recent interview about the project with environmental news website O Eco, Veronez did not attempt to disguise the project’s potential to cause environmental destruction:

“Deforestation for us is synonymous with progress, as much as it can shock people. Acre has no ore, no tourism potential, what it has are the best lands in Brazil. But this land has a problem, a forest on top.”

This article first appeared on Dialogo Chino.