文章 Articles

Wanted: a databank of disasters

If world governments could turn to a central information source on natural catastrophes, many lives could be saved through better preparedness, climate-hazards expert Bill McGuire tells Robin McKie.

Article image

Devastating natural disasters have killed close to a million people and caused billions of dollars of damage in the past few years. Despite its sophisticated technology, humanity remains hugely vulnerable to earthquakes, hurricanes, volcanic eruptions and other calamities. The danger is only likely to increase, say geologists and weather experts. Earth’s swelling numbers are forcing more and more people to live in geological and meteorological danger zones. As a result, death tolls are destined to rise.

In addition, human impact on the climate, which is warming relentlessly as more and more carbon dioxide is pumped into the atmosphere from cars, factories and power stations, will also worsen the problem. At higher latitudes, melting glaciers and ice sheets will modify the pressures acting on tectonic plates and volcanoes, potentially provoking more earthquakes and eruptions, while rising sea levels will leave many regions more vulnerable to hurricanes and storms.

Our planet needs help, badly, and Bill McGuire, professor of geophysical and climate hazards at University College London, believes he has a solution. We need a global clearing house in which details of all major natural threats are stored, evaluated and updated. All governments and other stakeholders can access the repository to obtain specific information on the hazards that threaten them, whether storm, quake, volcanic blast or tsunami, he says.

Robin McKie: There have been several recent catastrophes, including earthquakes in Haiti, Chile, New Zealand and Japan. Would the global clearing house you propose have helped lower their death tolls?

Bill McGuire: Not in every case. The earthquake in Japan, which triggered the tsunami on 11 March, arose from a geological fault that was not thought to be capable of releasing such devastating energies. The Christchurch earthquake in February, which killed more than 180 people, was set off by a fault that geologists did not even know about.

However, there have been many other examples in which dangers had been raised by geologists but which were not then passed on to governments or emergency managers, or at least not acted upon. Consider the Haitian earthquake of January 2010. It caused more than 250,000 deaths and up to US$14 billion of damage. Yet a scientific paper had been published a year earlier that contained a quite specific warning that the area was at high risk of suffering a major earthquake. Similarly, the dangers of the Chilean earthquake of February 2010, which caused around 500 deaths, had been highlighted in advance in another scientific paper.

On a personal level, I warned the [UK] ministry of defence several years ago of the dangers to aviation that could be posed by a major Icelandic volcanic eruption. The chaos that reigned when Eyjafjallajökull erupted in 2010 and our air transport was paralysed suggests that the warning had little influence on government preparedness.

RM: Can you pinpoint any places that are at risk of disaster in the near future?

BM: Yes. There are several. The Boxing Day [December 26] tsunami of 2004 in the Indian Ocean was triggered by a massive release of energy on a geological fault. However, there is one section along that fault which has still not released its energy. That could be triggered very soon. When it does, it is likely to cause a major earthquake and a tsunami with the potential to swamp the city of Padang, in Sumatra, and its population of more than 800,000 people.

On the other side of the world, it is known that the Caribbean experiences a major earthquake – that is, measuring more than 8.0 on the Richter scale – sometimes accompanied by a tsunami, every 50 years on average. There has not been one for more than 60 years, however (last year’s Haiti quake measured 7.0). So the level of concern is growing.

RM: It is one thing saying such risks exist, but how can ordinary people deal with them?

BM: That is a harder question to answer, and the key is better warning systems. To have these, however, you need to know the nature of the threats, which is where the repository comes in. There is movement, but it is slow. The Caribbean tsunami threat is now taken seriously enough that a warning system is planned. Without it, a big sub-marine quake in the future could see a tsunami crashing without any warning on to the shores of islands distant from the quake epicentre.

Even when and if a warning system becomes operational, there is still some way to go before a message that a wave is on its way can be transmitted in good time to the guy who runs that bar on the beach and to the people who are drinking there.

But effective warning systems need good, reliable information about the hazard they are intended to warn against, which is where the repository comes in. The idea is not new and was recommended by a committee, of which I was a member, established by [former British prime minister] Tony Blair after the 2004 tsunami. Despite the interest of the UN, there has been no further progress.

RM: Do you believe we will face increased risks of such events in future?

BM: Yes. The projected two billion rise in the world’s population [to nine billion in mid-century] will inevitably mean that far more people are vulnerable, particularly in the great coastal megacities of the developing world. In addition, we know from studies of periods of abrupt environmental change from the past – for example after the end of the last ice age – that ongoing climate change is likely to drive more geological hazards. Already the loss of ice in Alaska is driving more earthquakes, while rising temperatures in mountainous regions are provoking a rise in the numbers of massive landslides.

Future ice loss and bending of the crust due to rising sea levels have the potential ultimately to raise levels of both earthquake and volcanic activity. In short, we may well see a response from the solid earth to climate change and we need to be prepared for that.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/


Copyright © Guardian News and Media Limited 2011

Homepage image by Takashi Nakano shows earthquake and tsunami damage in Sendai, Japan.

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default thumb avatar
snowmantibet

加强信息交流,减轻灾害危害

灾害数据库建设是一个急需的问题,不只是像海啸,地震等这样的数据库,最为常见的应该是洪水和地质灾害数据。围绕亚洲高原的青藏高原、南亚和中亚高山区,随着气候变化,其自然灾害发生的频次和强度都在增加,如去年发生在巴基斯坦印度河流域的大洪水。我们需要合作和加强信息交流,共享数据,建立适应性管理的战略,减轻灾害危害。

boost information exchange and mitigate damage

it is imperative to build up a natural disaster database which covers not only tsunami and earthquake, more usually, but also flood and geological disasters. As climate changes, we have seen a rise of natural disasters in terms of frequency and intensity in Tibet-Qinghai plateau, South Asia and Centual Asia's mountainous regions. (eg:the flood in pakistan'sthe indus valley). Therefore, we need to work together on information exchanging and data sharing, to establish an adaptive management strategy to mitigate the damage.