文章 Articles

Facing Asia’s water woes

Concerns over water scarcity are particularly acute in Asia, writes Saleem H Ali. But despite the potential for conflict, there are also prospects for ecological cooperation.

Article image

As countries prepare for the climate change conference in Copenhagen later this year, water scarcity concerns that are likely to be exacerbated by climate change will need to be given priority. The situation is particularly acute for the world's largest continent. While home to more than half of the world's population, Asia has less fresh water—3,920 cubic metres per person—than any continent except Antarctica. Almost two-thirds of global population growth is occurring in Asia, which is expected to grow by nearly 500 million within the next 10 years, mostly in urban areas. In November 2008, The US National Intelligence Council highlighted Asian water scarcity in its Global Trends 2025 report: “With water becoming more scarce in Asia and the Middle East, cooperation to manage changing water resources is likely to become more difficult within and between states.”

Yet despite these indicators, there has been little progress at the international or regional level. Meetings, such as the World Water Forum, provide useful exchange of information but little policy intervention. And much of the popular reporting on water security has been polarised between those who believe that conflicts arise from water scarcity and others who consider such analysis sensationalist, pointing to the historical paucity of “water wars”. From the perspective of early warning assessments and strategic planning, policy-makers should not be complacent about the potential for water conflicts based simply on the historical record. Demographic pressures, resource scarcity and climate change dynamics in the coming century will be unprecedented.

The link between water and terrorism is also well established. Water can be used as a conduit for biological and chemical agents, and infrastructure used for water delivery and hydropower can be targeted during armed conflict. Last year the Taliban threatened to blow up Warsak Dam in Pakistan, which would have a catastrophic impact on the city of Peshawar.

Although the desire for an integrative approach to water resources has existed for several decades, the establishment of international water dispute mechanisms has been painfully slow. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses was promulgated in 1997, but has failed to muster the 35 votes needed for it to take effect. Ecosystems transcend political borders and water is the lifeline for all biological systems. Any attempts to contain water by political geographies are bound to have serious consequences on the natural system.

Small mountain states, such as Nepal and Bhutan, have a disproportionate share of water resources, which they can potentially leverage against the hegemonic influence of their larger neighbors. A water governance regime that takes into account such asymmetries is thus essential. The waters of the Tibetan plateau are precisely the kind of distributed resource over which zero-sum conflicts can arise in international relations.

Clearly the harnessing of waters from the Himalayan ranges and the Tibetan plateau is a priority for president Hu Jintao, who is himself a hydrologist and a firm supporter of the South-North Water Transfer Project. This is an ambitious attempt to build dams, canals, and waterways that would bring Himalayan water to Chinese cities. This will clearly raise concerns in India and Bangladesh, since rivers such as the Brahmaputra have their origins in China and there is no cooperative regime to address riparian distribution in this regard. Efforts are needed to ensure that such projects can be handled with minimal conflict.

Despite the potential for conflict over water, there are also prospects for ecological cooperation. Indeed, the Indus Waters Treaty between India and Pakistan exemplifies how riparian cooperation among adversaries can be facilitated by international agencies such as the World Bank. Furthermore, when water problems are transformed from a purely quantitative distributional concern to one of scientific inquiry, greater cooperative potential can also be realised.

Even in cases of highly polarised territorial conflict, such as Tibet, there must be an urgent call for joint research across borders to understand the dynamics of the changing glaciers and to find and disseminate adaptive strategies. As a starting point, China could promote interaction with Tibetan leaders on the issue of environmental education, while also granting global research teams greater access to study the decline of water resources on the Tibetan plateau.

All too often, countries assume that they will be able to desalinate seawater as a last resort. However, the potential for using massive amounts of energy (often oil) to harvest water from the sea is financially and ecologically unsustainable in the long run. This was most recently exemplified by the US$2.2 billion debt crisis of the Dubai Electricity and Water Authority. Until we find efficient renewable energy sources, desalination is untenable as a panacea for water scarcity, especially in highly populated Asian countries.

While much of the world remains focused on the geopolitics of oil, water may become the more salient and influential resource. The latest James Bond movie, “Quantum of Solace”, lends fictional impetus to the very real struggle for water access across many parts of the world. World leaders must treat the matter with utmost importance, particularly in Asia, and move toward a clear plan for meeting water demand through binding international agreements and domestic water conservation laws.

Because of its importance as a water source for the most populous parts of the world, the Himalayan and Tibetan region will be the bellwether for any progress that can be made on this vital resource issue. Initially the prospect of such cooperation may seem distant to many political realists, but if countries as disparate as the G20 can come together to work out solutions to our economic crisis, we can surely do the same for our most precious and life-giving resource.

Saleem H Ali is associate professor of environmental planning at the University of Vermont in the United States and the principal adviser for the Asia Society's Leadership Group on Water Security. www.saleemali.net
 

Homepage image by danielbachhuber

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

冰川消失为下游使用者带来的代价

印度已决定增加温室气体的人均排放量,数据直逼北美、欧洲和东亚的水平。这样做的后果很可能导致喜马拉雅山冰川的消失,而这恰恰是居住在印度及邻近国家的穷人们饮用、灌溉和赖以生存的主要水源。

印度的领导人应当反思冰川消失将带来大规模迁徙的成本消耗及农业产量减损。此外,如果他们在意国民的长远福祉,就应当大幅度缩减工业发展计划(并更积极地游说北美、欧洲和亚洲其他地方执行碳减排计划)。

此篇由刘雅晴翻译

The cost of disappearing glaciers to downstream users

India has opted to increase its greenhouse gas emissions until - per capita - they approach those of North America, Europe and East Asia. Consequently, the glaciers in the Himalayas on which the poor in India and neighbouring countries heavily depend for their drinking and irrigation water will probably disappear.

India's leaders should reflect on the huge cost of the migration and loss of agricultural production which the disappearance of those glaciers will cause - and then, if interested in the long term welfare of their population, greatly curtail their industrial development plans (and lobby more effectively for reductions in carbon emissions in North America, Europe and elsewhere in Asia).

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

既要开源也要节流

水资源短缺的确是一个很大的挑战,不过关注这一点的同时,也要注意到怎样更有效地利用现有的水资源。比如如今很多江河都被污染,这是一种极大的浪费。

Both developing resources and controlling them

Water supply shortages are indeed a big challenge. Not only do we have to pay attention to this, but at the same time we have to find ways to use our water resources more effectively. For example, much of the Yangtze River is polluted; this is a large waste. (Translated by Michelle Deeter)

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

几千年以来,对生存资源的争夺导致不同民族、国家间爆发战争。在20世纪,石油是引发国际冲突的火药桶,中东的人们也因此受尽苦难。而21世纪,引发战争的源头很可能是水,水资源的稀缺与人类发展的需求决定了国家间水资源的分配将受到越来越多的关注。

water

Over the last several thousand years,the wars have arisen as a inevitable consequence of struggling for human survival resources. In 20 century,Oil was a powder keg that caused international conflicts,and people in Middle East had suffered all kinds of hardships for it. As for 21 century,it is water that can be the cause of the war.Distribution of water resources among countries, which determined by the water shortage and the fundamental requirements of human development, has been drawing more and more attention.
(translated by Lei Wang)