文章 Articles

Organic food at a crossroads

The Chinese public are concerned about the safety of their food, government surveys have shown. But many factors still prevent consumers from buying the chemical-free produce they want, writes Jiang Gaoming.

Article image

Last month I took a group of students on a field trip to Shandong province, eastern China. The local watermelon harvest was underway, and buyers were flocking to the area. We gave the local farmers access to our scales so they could weigh their produce, and they each left us a watermelon in return. On eating them, however, we found the watermelons lacked their customary sweetness and granulated texture: the flesh was more like meat. The watermelon plants had been grafted onto gourds, so that they would be more pest-resistant, grow larger, faster and be more productive. These watermelons, which are sold to consumers in the cities, present a food safety risk. 

A quality of life survey conducted last year by the State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) – now the Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) – found that food safety was one of the most important environmental concerns for the Chinese public. There is an increasing demand for healthy and environmentally friendly foods that are free of pesticides, fertilisers, herbicides, hormones and genetic modification: organic food, in short.

Unfortunately, China’s organic food industry has a long way to go. China produces 3 billion yuan (US$438 million) worth of organic food every year, with US$200 million going to export: around 1% of the global organic food market. Organic food accounts for only 0.02% of the total domestic food market; the global average is 2%. Many artificial factors are holding back the sector, and here are some:

Faking it

Producing organic food requires more time and labour than the alternative, with lower yields in return. Consumers are also often unable to tell the difference between the two. Consequently, many Chinese vendors will pass off non-organic produce as organic food. Some producers run small, tightly-controlled organic operations of 30 to 40 mu (0.02 to 0.025 square kilometres) in order to gain organic certification, then package their non-organic produce as organic at a fraction of the cost. I discovered one producer on the outskirts of Beijing, whose “organic” vegetables were grown under canopies with no sign of organic production, not even organic fertiliser. The farm, however, had been certified as organic, and they were selling the vegetables at organic prices.

Farmers’ double standards

Nobody knows food safety better than farmers: they understand the dangers of pesticides, fertilisers, herbicides, additives, hormones and GM crops. When they grow their own vegetables – on their land, in their gardens and even on their roofs – it’s organic. They will not eat battery chickens that are brought to maturity in only 45 days, preferring free-range chickens from their own yards that have been raised for 150 days. They know that the food they produce is unhealthy, but they will not risk the alternative because of the threat posed by greater costs, smaller harvests and lower market prices. Last year I asked some farmers in Yimeng, Shandong province, to grow 1.5 mu (1,000 square metres) of organic garlic using no fertilisers, pesticides, herbicide or agricultural membrane. Despite its excellent flavour, the buyers were not interested because the bulbs were all different sizes. I had to buy the crop myself and give it away to friends.

Consumer ignorance

Urban consumers have little agricultural knowledge and can only distinguish organic and non-organic foods by the label. They are unlikely to choose less-attractive, pricier organic food. Naturally ripened tomatoes may be green on the outside and red on the inside, unlike tomatoes that have been forced to ripen with chemicals; free-range eggs are of different sizes and colours, unlike uniform eggs from battery chickens. When faced with these choices, consumers often prefer the non-organic option. In other parts of the world, organic food tends to be about 50% more expensive; in China, it can be between two to 10 times the price of non-organic food. (In a few cases, even 50 times the price). The beef we helped raise in Shandong province is free of hormones and additives, and the cows still reach weights of 510 kilograms. But if the price were identical, farms would prefer to raise cows non-organically. If the price were higher by 10% then there a small profit could be made, and at a 50% premium it would be the preferred choice, yet still remain affordable for high-income urban households.

Building capacity

Organic food production means protecting the environment and repairing the land. It is a field for those with a high degree of social responsibility and environmental awareness. However, some organic food producers, lacking the capital that allows one to have a long-term view, pass off second-rate products as high quality, or simply sell fakes. There are profits to be made in organic food, but it requires strategic foresight, social responsibility and financial backing to find them. There can be 10-fold or even 100-fold differences in price between different items of clothing, cigarettes, tea, alcohol, cosmetics and even labour: there is a market for dearer options. But the same is not true of food in China. If the organic food industry can persuade consumers to pay a higher price in exchange for better quality, there are profits to be made. But doing this will require patience, confidence and trust-building.

Although China’s Ministry of Agriculture and other government bodies have strict rules on organic food production, their work is focused on certification, and there is a lack of oversight in production and processing. Producers are often warned of imminent inspections, and officials are unaware of what actually happens on the ground. The production of organic food involves agriculture, food processing and environmental protection: government supervision requires participation from a range of experts if it is to be effective.

The organic food sector is a rising star in the agriculture and food industries, with huge potential for growth. Fostering this sector will need active leadership and financial backing from government. Scientists must provide the public with the facts, while urban consumers need to make wise buying decisions. Farmers should pay as much care to the food they grow for market as that they grow for their tables, in order to protect their own interests and be sure to make a living.

Jiang Gaoming is a professor and Ph.D. tutor at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Botany. He is also vice secretary-general of the UNESCO China-MAB (Man and the Biosphere) Committee and a member of the UNESCO MAB Urban Group. He is known for his concepts of “urban vegetation” and allowing damaged ecosystems to recover naturally.

Homepage photo by Qiao-Da-Ye

Now more than ever…

chinadialogue is at the heart of the battle for truth on climate change and its challenges at this critical time.

Our readers are valued by us and now, for the first time, we are asking for your support to help maintain the rigorous, honest reporting and analysis on climate change that you value in a 'post-truth' era.

Support chinadialogue

发表评论 Post a comment

评论通过管理员审核后翻译成中文或英文。 最大字符 1200。

Comments are translated into either Chinese or English after being moderated. Maximum characters 1200.

评论 comments

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

其他人不能够对政府法令加以警觉么?

非政府组织(NGO)或者由政府组织的非政府组织(GONGO)或许可以去监督种植有机作物的农户们的行为。难道试图发现农户作假行为的人会被指控?还是人们只是对在这上面花太多时间不感兴趣?

(本评论由Zheng Shen翻译)

Other individuals can be vigilant on government laws?

Maybe there should be non-governmental organizations (NGOs) or government organized non-governmental organizations (GONGOs) who check up on the farming practices of 'organic' farmers. Would individuals be prosecuted if they tried to find out the practices? Or are people just not that interested to spend so much time?

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

中国缺乏有机评估体系

现有的认证部门人少工作量大,以及人们对有机食品的认知度不够导致了对于有机生产的监管力度的薄弱。公众无疑是最好的监督体系,可是在我们的评估体系中,政府性质的NGO起到了评估有机标准的重要力量,第三方的参与度的正确性有待考证。
食品安全关乎我们的健康,人在食物链的最后,不关乎食品安全就是不关乎我们自己的健康。
食品安全台湾做的不错,应该多学习。

Absence of a solid assessment system for organic food

The short-handed existing assessment department with its over-sized task and the public's low recognition of the organic food are the major causes of the weak monitoring of the prducing of the organic food. The public is for sure the best assessment system, while the government-like NGOs are playing the major role, with the legitimacy of third party involvement to be discussed.

The food security equals our health. We human beings being at the very end of the food chain, our failure to ensure the food security will compromise our own health.

In this particular area, we should learn more from Taiwan where they have more successful experience.

(This comment was translated by Zheng Shen.)

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

资金才是问题

我认为,食品问题不能指望小农。他们生活在社会中下层。粮价被压低的时候不为他们说话,这个时候我们凭什么要求他们呢?
企业化是一个好的解决办法。(http://www.ccw.com.cn/work2/corp/htm2007/20070620_274980_2.htm)问题是,现在的农业企业太少提供这个了。他们缺少资金,有机食品需要技术,更需要资金。
因为现在的投资银行大多不关注这个行业,所以要办企业只能指望政府提供资金。这是个难题。
(pc panchunxiang3802[email protected])

Funding is an issue.

I don't think we can count on small farms to resolve our food problems. They live in the lower levels of society. When the prices of provisions were falling, their interests were less talked about, so what do we require of them now? Industrialization is a good solution. The problem is, less agricultural enterprises can afford to do so. They lack funding. Organic foods need technology, and further, need funding. As most investment banks are not interested in this industry, the agricultural enterprises will have to rely on the government to provide funding. It's difficult.

(http://www.ccw.com.cn/work2/corp/htm2007/20070620_274980_2.htm)
pc [email protected]

(This comment was translated by Kate Truax)

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

当地食品

这是一篇认真调研后的文章。现在制度上还存在着很多问题。在美国,现在的运动不仅仅是针对有机食品,而是更多的针对当地食品。随着天然气价格的上涨,如果当季的食物不需要高价的化肥,生长在附近的农庄,价格就会便宜很多。我很好奇在北京大街上由小贩们贩卖的蔬菜水果,它们是在离北京多远的地方种植?它们又有多少本地产的成分?---约翰

本评论由Ling Huang翻译

local food

This was a well researched article. There are so many problems with the system! In America, the movement now is not only for organic food, but more so for local food. With higher gas prices, food can be a lot cheaper if it was grown in season, without high-cost fertilizers, at a farm nearby. I wonder, on the local street in Beijing, with local sellers of vegetables and fruits, how far away those foods were grown? How local are they?
- John

Default avatar
匿名 | Anonymous

确实是朝阳产业

我怀着准备投资有机产业的目的,仔细阅读了这篇文章.我认为,发展有机产业关键在各级政府.目前,很多领导人没有认识到食品安全问题是关乎民族未来兴衰的大事,监督不严,引导和扶持不够,但我认为政府的认识和行动不久的将来会到位的.企业家如果有雄厚的实力和足够的耐心,现在投资有机食品产业是个不错的选择.

A rising industry for sure

I perused this article with a motive of investing in the organic food industy. I take that the key role for the growth of organic industry is the government at all levels. Few leaders are now aware that the food safity issue is an important issue in connection with the rise or fall of our nation in future and this leads to lax supervision, insufficient guides and supports to the industry. But I think the governments will be soon aware of this and act in place. It is a quite good option to invest in the organic food industry now provided you are an enterpriser with solid capability and patience.

Translated by Ming Li